Sponsored Links

Featured Links

Other Topics
Sponsored Links



Quote of the Day

"Do not go where the path may lead, go instead where there is no path and leave a trail."

Ralph Waldo Emerson

FEATURED
PRODUCTS
 
Direct Satellite PC - PC To TV Product...
 
Pc Satellite Tv Box
 
Satellite TV for PC
 
Easy TV - Get Satellite TV On Your PC
 
3000 Live TV Channels On Your PC!
 




 


Google

 
Featured Law Articles

Is Pursuing a Career in Patent Law the Right Move For You?
Did you know that you might be eligible to gain entry into the field of patent law even without a law degree? The basic requirements are a degree in a technology-related field and the will to pass the Patent Bar Exam. The field of ...

Personal Injury Law Resource Site Opens
The Personal Injury Lawyer Directory - http://www.the-injury-lawyer-directory.com is now open to serve the needs of a growing community of people who are looking for no-nonsense information about drug recall lawsuits and a handy resource ...

What Is The Lemon Law - A Concise Definition
Lemon law refers to the statement from the government that was created to protect consumers from defective piece of automobile. An automobile that has manufacturing defect or if it asks for repeated repairs after purchase and if the ...





A paradox of law...
 

A Paradox of Law

Terry Dashner…….Faith Fellowship Church PO Box 1586 Broken Arrow, OK 74013

There is an interesting paradox in II Samuel 3:13-16. May I tell you the story?

“’Good,’ said David. ‘I will make an agreement with you. But I demand one thing of you: Do not come into my presence unless you bring Michal daughter of Saul when you come to see me.’ Then David sent messengers to Ish-Bosheth son of Saul, demanding, ‘Give me my wife Michal, whom I betrothed to myself for the price of a hundred Philistine foreskins.’

“So Ish-Bosheth gave orders and had her taken away from her husband Paltiel son of Laish. Her husband, however, went with her, weeping behind her all the way to Bahurim. Then Abner said to him, ‘Go back home!’ So he went back.” (NIV)

Here’s the gig. King Saul, when he was alive, had promised his daughter Michal to David for a bounty of blood. When David followed through with his end of the deal, Saul reneged, out of contempt for David, and gave her to Paltiel instead. This broke David’s heart, but he got on with his life. When Saul died and Abner wanted to consolidate the tribes of Israel as one nation, he made a deal with David. David agreed to the terms on one condition. He wanted Michal who was his wife legally. And he got her. It seems that God was okay with that.

This, nevertheless, puzzles me. Did David have the right to ask for Michal? Legally, yes. Did Abner have the right to deliver her to David? Probably. Or so it could be argued. Now here’s where the story moves from black-and-white to gray. What about Michal and her husband, Paltiel? Did they have any say in the matter? It appears that Paltiel was grief stricken and deeply hurt. Did he have the right to protest? Did he have any legal recourse?

Let me advance the clock to modern day Israel. God gave Israel the land of modern Palestine by covenant, during the life of Abraham. The Jews lived and held the land for many centuries, until they were finally dispersed in 70 AD. It wasn’t until 1948 that Israel occupied her home, once again, as a legal nation. And now she is asked to give back the Gaza which she has claimed since the six-day war of 1967. She is doing it as I write, but she’s not doing it

without major protests.

May I ask you to solve this paradox for me, please? If Israel owns the land by divine right and by tradition, isn’t it her land forever? If not, then whose national law is superior to Israel’s and has the right to condemn her? Outside Divine Law and Israel’s sovereign law, whose law can force her to comply? And consider this: if her land was given to her by divine right, then logic says that only the Divine can serve her with the eviction notice, right?

Okay, I know Paltiel got his feelings hurt, but his marriage to Michal was “fruit” from a poison vine (no pun intended) to begin with and was, therefore, null-and-void, right? David had every legal right to claim and demand what was legally his. The only questionable action is this: should Paltiel be compensated for the loss of something that didn’t belong to him in the first place? You decide and let me know.

Apart from civil damages, material compensations, and the concern regarding human feelings, I think, if anything, this story in II Samuel reminds us just how complicated life can become when unscrupulous men become a law unto themselves. King Saul reneged on his contract simply because he despised David. And because he was king, he took matters into his own hands.

I still believe that God’s Law should always by honored as the highest law in the land. I believe that all laws should reflect God’s law—criminally and civilly. Life functions in the black-and-white when men honor God’s Law from the “git-go.” Nations thrive when they honor God by heritage. It’s only when nations hold God’s Law in contempt and establish their own standards that the black-and-white turns pallid gray. I believe law is important to a civilized country. But, do away with God’s Law and every man becomes a law unto himself. And touchy-feely-sentiment will become the prevailing order of the day.

Keep the faith. Stay the course. Justice will prevail if not in this life, in the life to come.

Pastor T

About the Author

Pastors a small church. U.S. Navy veteran of the Viet Nam era. Retired police officer for the city of Tulsa. Father of three grown children and grandfather of two--one rests in the arms of Jesus in heaven above.

Written by: Terry Dashner



Law News



AFP

Supreme Court to hear government eavesdropping appeal
Reuters
By James Vicini | WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The Supreme Court agreed on Monday to hear an Obama administration appeal arguing that attorneys, journalists and human rights groups have no right to sue over a law making it easier for US intelligence agencies ...
Supreme Court to Consider Suit Challenging Wiretap LawBusinessWeek
Supreme Court Agrees to Hear Case on SurveillanceNew York Times
High court will take up wiretaps lawsuitFox News
Washington Post
all 251 news articles »

Sun News Network

Quebec's largest student group vows defiance of emergency law
Globe and Mail
Quebec's largest student group has vowed to defy the Quebec government's new emergency law, calling for a summer of protests and acts of civil disobedience. CLASSE, the more radical of the province's three main student associations, declared Monday it ...
Protestors flout emergency law for second consecutive nightSun News Network
Student group urges Quebecers to disobey new lawToronto Star
Quebec's emergency law, high-profile supporters emboldens protest movementWinnipeg Free Press
CBC.ca -CTV.ca
all 904 news articles »

CBS Local

China Urges Exiled Dissident to Follow Chinese Law
Voice of America
Monday, 21 May 2012 China Urges Exiled Dissident to Follow Chinese Law Stephanie Ho Chinese officials are calling on exiled dissident Chen Guangcheng to follow Chinese law, although they gave no details on whether authorities would allow the blind ...
Chinese activist in NYC is 'seriously troubled'Seattle Post Intelligencer
Blind Chinese Dissident Arrives At NYU, Prepares To Study LawCBS Local
Blind Chinese activist Chen Guangcheng rests in New York CityNDTV
South China Morning Post (subscription)
all 1,302 news articles »

Opposing Views

Nike co-founder's daughter-in-law loses volunteer coaching job after escorting ...
Washington Post
The daughter-in-law of Nike co-founder Bill Bowerman has been dismissed as a volunteer track coach at a small Eastern Oregon high school because she escorted a 17-year-old boy to last month's prom. Melissa Bowerman, 41, who had been coaching the ...
Melissa Bowerman, Daughter-in-Law of Nike Co-Founder, Fired for Escorting ...Opposing Views

all 224 news articles »

CBS Local

POM Wonderful Juice Ad Claims Violated Law, FTC Judge Says
BusinessWeek
By Jeff Bliss on May 21, 2012 POM Wonderful LLC's advertising claims about the health benefits of its pomegranate juice drink violated the law, according to a US Federal Trade Commission administrative law judge. POM Wonderful made “false or ...
Administrative Law Judge Ruling: Some Health Claims for Pomegranate Products ...eNews Park Forest
Judge: POM Wonderful Claims To Treat, Prevent Serious Diseases Violated ...CBS Local
Court Affirms POM's Right to Inform Their Consumers of Products' Health BenefitsPR Newswire (press release)
brandchannel.com -Natural Products INSIDER
all 116 news articles »